COGNITIVE FEATURES OF ETHNONYMS
Боковая панель статьи
Основное содержимое статьи
Аннотация
Abstract. Ethnonyms, the names used to identify and refer to ethnic groups, carry profound cognitive implications that extend far beyond mere labels. Embedded within these seemingly simple terms are complex webs of identity, perception, and cultural constructs, shaping how individuals and societies perceive themselves and others. Exploring the cognitive features of ethnonyms unveils the intricate interplay between language, culture, and cognition, offering insights into the multifaceted nature of human categorization and social dynamics.
Информация о статье
Библиографические ссылки
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge
Jenkins, R. (2008). Rethinking Ethnicity: Arguments and Explorations. Sage.
Joseph, J. E. (2004). Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Palgrave Macmillan.
Le Page, R. B., & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.
Sapir, E. (1949). Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality. University of California Press.
Rakhmonova, A., & Eʼzoza, A. (2023). Informational Technologies in the modern classrooms.
Rakhmonova, A. (2022). Stylistic means with “eyes” and “eyebrows” in the manifestation of emotions of personages (based on English and Uzbek novels).
Rakhmonova, A., & Abduhakimova, Z. (2024). Pragmalinguistic aspects of emotiveness in English language. Pedagogs, 51(1), 167-170.
Amira R., Maftuna N. SOME FEATURES OF PHRASAL UNITS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE //Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi. – 2024. – Т. 20. – №. 2. – С. 86-88.
Ulfatovna, R. A. (2022, December). BADIIY PERSONAJLARNING HISSIYOTLARINI NAMOYON QILISHDA MUBOLAG ‘A (GIPERBOLA) NING QO ‘LLANILISHI (O ‘ZBEK VA INGLIZ TILLARI MISOLIDA). In Proceedings of International Conference on Modern Science and Scientific Studies (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 245-252).