TEACHING PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE: THE CASE OF HEDGING

Main Article Content

Askarova G.X.

Abstract

Abstract. Competence-based language teaching which has become an integral part of teaching foreign languages at the present moment is paid attention to. Basic language competences are distinguished highlighting communicative competence which demonstrates a student’s ability to use a foreign language in such a way that will be appropriate from the point of view of linguistics, socio-linguistics and pragmatics. Teaching students’ pragmatic competence in general and the use of hedges in particular is focused on. The interpretation of hedges and their classification are analysed. Awareness-raising tasks such as identification, cross- linguistic comparisons, reconstruction, reformulation and metalinguistic discussion as a method of teaching learners’ pragmatic competence are considered.

Article Details

How to Cite
Askarova G.X. (2024). TEACHING PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE: THE CASE OF HEDGING . PEDAGOGS, 61(1), 47–52. Retrieved from https://pedagogs.uz/index.php/ped/article/view/1703
Section
Статьи

References

Brown P. and Levinson S. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In Goody E, N. (ed.) Questions and Politeness. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978. P. 56-310

Cotton D., Falvey D., Kent S. Market Leader Intermediate. Intermediate business English course. New Edition. Pearson Longman.

Fraser B. Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In Kaltenböck G., Mihatsch W. and Schneider S. (eds.) New approaches to hedging. UK, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010. P. 15-35.

Hyland K. Hedging in academic textbooks and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 1994, Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 239-256.

Kot A. Advanced learners’ perceptions of hedges and awareness-raisi

ng tasks. In Andrzej Łyda and Konrad Szcześniak (eds.) Awareness in action. The role of consciousness in language acquisition. Switzerland, Springer, 2014. P. 131-151.

Lakoff G. Hedges: a meaning in study criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1973, 2 (4), pp. 458-508.