SEMANTIC PECULIARITIES OF SPORT PHRASEMES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: – The article analyses the semantic features of phraseological units in sport. The purpose of the work is to study the phraseological units of a particular area of usage in sport. The objectives of the study are to identify thematic groups of phraseological units and defining their pragmatic goals in the genre of sports journalism as a kind of spontaneous public speech. Collected material can be used in linguistic and stylistic analysis of texts of various styles and genres. They are mainly considered to be the product of sport commentators’ intelligence. We also write about the importance of the context while translating phraseological units. He claims that depending on the context the translation of the same phraseological units may differ. The author also explains the differences between sport phrases and terms using various sport matches. We come to the conclusion that the above-mentioned methods are very important while translating phraseological units. The importance of phraseological units, namely sport phrases and terms in the communication process relating to sport terminology has been stated in the article as well.
Article Details
References
Britannica Educational Publishing (2015). Lacrosse and Its Greatest Players. Britannica Educational Publishing. pp. 10–12. ISBN 978-1-62275-593-6.
Botirbekova G.A, Sharipova S.B, “National mentality and culture in language learning”, Ijtimoiy fanlarda innovasiya onlayn ilmiy jurnali 2023/3 (12), 1-4
Larin B.A. Essays on phraseology. On the systematization and methods of study of phraseology. – Leningrad University., 1956. P. 22
Куранова Т.П. Метафора как средство создания выразительности в дискурсе телевизионного спортивного репортажа. – Ярославль: РИО ЯГПУ, 2018. С. 111-116.
Newmark P. About Translation. – London:, 1991. P. 35
Vinogradov V.V. The main understanding of Russian phraseology as a linguistic discipline. – Мoscow:, Science, 1977. P. 21
Smirnitsky A.I. Lexicology of the English Language. – M.: 1956. P. 153
Szerszunowicz J. Lacunarity, lexicography and beyond: integration of the introduction of a linguo-cultural concept and the development of l2 learners’ dictionary skills. Lexicography, 2(1), 2015. 101-118 pp. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s40607-015-0015-6
Vinay J.P., Darbelnet J. Stylistique comparee du fraicais et de I’anglais. – Paris, 1958.
White P. Chambers Sport factfinder. – Edinburg: Chambers. – 2005. P. 32
Usmonova Sh. Lingvokulturologiya (fanidan ma’ruzalar kursi). ‒ Toshkent:, Universitet, 2014. B. 79
Амосова Н.Н. Основы английской фразеологии. – Ленинград: ЛГУ, 1963. C. 360.
Мусаев Қ. Таржима назарияси асослари. Фан. –Т.: 2005. - 4 б.
Раҳимов Ғ., Таржима назарияси ва амалиёти. Д авлат илмий нашриёти. 2016 й. - Б 52.
Саломов Ғ. Тил ва таржима. – Т.: 1976. - 285 б.
Ўзбек тилининг изоҳли луғати. 5 жилдли. 1-5- жилдлар. –Тошкент: “Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси” Давлат илмий нашриёти. 2006-2008.
Федуленкова Т.Н., Иванов А.И., Куприна Т.В. Фразеология и терминология: грани пересечения: Монография. – Архангельск:, 2009. 23 с.
Кунин А.В. Основные понятия фразеологии как лингвистической дисциплины. – М:, 1964. C. 58
Кунин А.В. Курс фразеологии современного английского языка. Издание второе. – М., 1996. C. 43.
Кунин А.В. Англо-русский фразеологический словарь. Издание 4-е. – М.: 1984. C. 944
Рычкова Н.Г. Синтаксические механизмы формирования экспресивности (на примере предложений с русскими глагольными фразеологизмами с прототипической структурой перемещения): Дис. канд. филол. наук. – Новосибирск, 2017. C. 413.
Поливанов Е.Д. Введение в языкознание для востоковедных вузов. – Л:, 1958. C. 67
http://www.Oxfordonlinedictionary.com
http://www.argentinapolo.com/polohistory.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polocrosse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achilles_tendon